New York Statutes
§ 2610 — Collision or comprehensive coverage on motor vehicles; claims; repairs
New York·Law ISC Insurance·Art. 26 Unfair Claim Settlement Practices; Other Misconduct; Discrimination
§ 2610. Collision or comprehensive coverage on motor vehicles; claims;\nrepairs.
(a)Whenever a motor vehicle collision or comprehensive loss\nshall have been suffered by an insured, no insurer providing collision\nor comprehensive coverage therefor shall require that repairs be made to\nsuch vehicle in a particular place or shop or by a particular concern.\n (b) In processing any such claim (other than a claim solely involving\nwindow glass), the insurer shall not, unless expressly requested by the\ninsured, recommend or suggest repairs be made to such vehicle in a\nparticular place or shop or by a particular concern.\n (c) The insurer shall provide (other than a claim solely involving\nwindow glass) a copy of its repair estimate to the insured that includes\nthe following disclosure,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New York § 2610 (Collision or comprehensive coverage on motor vehicles; claims; repairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allstate Insurance Company v. Gregory V. Serio
261 F.3d 143 (Second Circuit, 2001)
M.V.B. Collision, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance
728 F. Supp. 2d 205 (E.D. New York, 2010)
Allstate Insurance v. Serio
774 N.E.2d 180 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Rizzo v. Merchants & Businessmen's Mutual Insurance
188 Misc. 2d 180 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Allstate Insurance v. Serio
261 F.3d 143 (Second Circuit, 2001)
North State Autobahn, Inc. v. Progressive Insurance Group
32 Misc. 3d 798 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)
Nadel v. Allstate Insurance
36 Misc. 3d 17 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Nick's Garage, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
101 F. Supp. 3d 185 (N.D. New York, 2015)
Allstate Insurance Company v. Serio
293 F.3d 95 (Second Circuit, 2002)