Georgia Statutes
§ 24-6-611 — Mode and order of witness interrogation and presentation
Georgia § 24-6-611
JurisdictionGeorgia
Title24
This text of Georgia § 24-6-611 (Mode and order of witness interrogation and presentation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O.C.G.A. § 24-6-611 (2026).
Text
(a)The court shall exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to:
(1)Make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth;
(2)Avoid needless consumption of time; and (3) Protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.
(b)A witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the proceeding. The right of a thorough and sifting cross-examination shall belong to every party as to the witnesses called against the party. If several parties to the same proceeding have distinct interests, each party may exercise the right to cross-examination.
(c)Leading questions shall not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lupoe v. State
794 S.E.2d 67 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Smith v. State
788 S.E.2d 433 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Moss v. State
783 S.E.2d 652 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
Parks v. State
794 S.E.2d 623 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
DAVIS v. THE STATE (Two Cases)
306 Ga. 140 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2019)
Boothe v. State
745 S.E.2d 594 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)
Slaton v. State
303 Ga. 651 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Baker v. State
750 S.E.2d 137 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)
Johnson v. State
889 S.E.2d 914 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2023)
Taylor v. State
805 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
Williams v. State
888 S.E.2d 60 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2023)
Sinkfield v. State
899 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2024)
Brown v. State
875 S.E.2d 784 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2022)
Lucas v. State
810 S.E.2d 490 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Upshaw v. State
796 S.E.2d 287 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
Barton-Smith v. State
848 S.E.2d 384 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2020)
Dunn v. State
756 S.E.2d 17 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Summerville v. State
907 S.E.2d 604 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2024)
Spencer v. State
761 S.E.2d 464 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
CARDINAL HEALTH INC. v. JOSEPH POPPELL (And Vice Versa)
319 Ga. 670 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2024)
Legislative History
Added by 2011 Ga. Laws 52,§ 2, eff. 1/1/2013.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 24-1-101
§ 24-1-101§ 24-1-102
§ 24-1-102§ 24-1-103
Rulings on evidence§ 24-1-104
Preliminary questions§ 24-1-105
Limited admissibility§ 24-10-1001
Definitions§ 24-10-1002
Requirement of original§ 24-10-1003
Admissibility of duplicates§ 24-10-1005
Public records§ 24-10-1006
Summaries§ 24-10-1007
Testimony or written admission of partyCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Georgia § 24-6-611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ga/24-6-611.