Connecticut Statutes
§ 53a-3 — Definitions.
Connecticut § 53a-3
This text of Connecticut § 53a-3 (Definitions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-3 (2026).
Text
Except where different meanings are expressly specified, the following terms have the following meanings when used in this title:
(1)“Person” means a human being, and, where appropriate, a public or private corporation, a limited liability company, an unincorporated association, a partnership, a government or a governmental instrumentality;
(2)“Possess” means to have physical possession or otherwise to exercise dominion or control over tangible property;
(3)“Physical injury” means impairment of physical condition or pain;
(4)“Serious physical injury” means physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ;
(5)“Deadly physical force” means physi
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jaroslaw Chrzanoski 1 v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General
327 F.3d 188 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Villanueva v. United States
893 F.3d 123 (Second Circuit, 2018)
State v. Holmes
817 A.2d 689 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2003)
Canada v. Gonzales
448 F.3d 560 (Second Circuit, 2006)
State v. Hardy
896 A.2d 755 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)
Villanueva v. United States
191 F. Supp. 3d 178 (D. Connecticut, 2016)
State v. Daniels
213 A.3d 517 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019)
State v. Haughwout
339 Conn. 747 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021)
Kondjoua v. Barr
961 F.3d 83 (Second Circuit, 2020)
Hudson v. Babilonia
192 F. Supp. 3d 274 (D. Connecticut, 2016)
State v. Schofield, No. Cr 98-468691 (Aug. 16, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 12084 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
In the Interest of Cesar G. (May 4, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 5572 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Balbi v. Ridgefield Public Schools, No. Cv99 033 80 11 S (Aug. 16, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 10204 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Harris v. Barbieri, No. Cv 94-0359356 (Dec. 21, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 14525 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
State v. Cowern, No. Cr00-202507 (Apr. 2, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 4921 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
In Re Esmeraldo H., (May 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 6003 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Abc v. State Ethics Commission of Ct, No. Cv 00 0504071 S (Dec. 12, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 16372 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Roque v. United States
(D. Connecticut, 2019)
Magana v. Lupo
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
Nat'l Ass'n for Gun Rights v. Lamont; Grant v. Rovella
(Second Circuit, 2025)
Legislative History
(1969, P.A. 828, S. 3; 1971, P.A. 871, S. 1; 1972, P.A. 188, S. 3; P.A. 73-295; 73-639, S. 1; P.A. 74-180; 74-186, S. 8, 129; P.A. 75-283; 75-380, S. 1; P.A. 76-111, S. 9; P.A. 77-604, S. 38, 84; 77-614, S. 486, 610; P.A. 80-308; 80-394, S. 8, 13; P.A. 85-602, S. 3, 4; P.A. 86-280, S. 2; 86-287, S. 2; P.A. 90-157, S. 1; P.A. 91-171, S. 1; May 25 Sp. Sess. P.A. 94-1, S. 98, 130; P.A. 95-79, S. 182, 189; 95-277, S. 13, 19; P.A. 96-243, S. 7, 16; P.A. 00-99, S. 5, 154; 00-149, S. 1; P.A. 01-84, S. 9, 26; P.A. 02-132, S. 29; P.A. 07-123, S. 6; P.A. 11-51, S. 134; P.A. 13-170, S. 3; P.A. 15-211, S. 18; P.A. 19-108, S. 1; P.A. 21-31, S. 4; P.A. 22-117, S. 8; P.A. 23-53, S. 36.) History: 1971 act included snowmobiles in definition of “vehicle” and added definitions of “peace officer” and “fireman”; 1972 act redefined “peace officer” to include special policemen appointed under Sec. 29-18; P.A. 73-295 added reference to special policemen appointed under Sec. 29-18a in definition of “peace officer”; P.A. 73-639 specified that weapons “whether loaded or unloaded” are deadly weapons; P.A. 74-180 amended definition of “deadly weapon” to specify its inapplicability to Secs. 29-38 and 53-206; P.A. 74-186 replaced county detectives with detectives in division of criminal justice in definition of “peace officer”, county government having been abolished; P.A. 75-283 included special policemen appointed under Sec. 29-19 in definition of “peace officer”; P.A. 75-380 added Subdivs. (15) to (19) defining “machine gun”, “rifle”, “shotgun”, “pistol” or “revolver” and “firearm”; P.A. 76-111 substituted chief inspectors and inspectors for detectives in definition of “peace officer”; P.A. 77-604 made technical grammatical correction in Subdiv. (9); P.A. 77-614 made state police department a division within the department of public safety, effective January 1, 1979, amending Subdiv. (9) accordingly; P.A. 80-308 included adult probation officers appointed under Sec. 54-104 in definition of “peace officer”; P.A. 80-394 included special deputy sheriffs in definition of “peace officer”; P.A. 85-602 redefined “peace officer” to include investigators in the investigations unit of the state treasurer's office; P.A. 86-280 defined “martial arts weapon”; P.A. 86-287 reiterated definition of “martial arts weapon” and defined “electronic defense weapon”; P.A. 90-157 added Subdiv. (22) defining “employee of an emergency medical service organization”; P.A. 91-171 included special agents of the federal government authorized to enforce the provisions of Title 21 of the United States Code in definition of “peace officer”; May 25 Sp. Sess. P.A. 94-1 amended Subdiv. (9) by making technical change, effective July 1, 1994; P.A. 95-79 redefined “person” to include a limited liability company, effective May 31, 1995; P.A. 95-277 redefined “peace officer”, to include investigators in the office of the State Treasurer rather than Workers' Compensation Commission investigators, effective June 29, 1995; P.A. 96-243 amended Subdiv. (7) to include certain dogs in the definition of “dangerous instrument”, effective June 6, 1996; P.A. 00-99 amended Subdiv. (9) by deleting reference to sheriff, deputy sheriff and special deputy sheriff and adding provision re state marshal exercising statutory authority and judicial marshal in performance of duties, effective December 1, 2000; P.A. 00-149 added Subdiv. (23) defining “railroad property”; P.A. 01-84 amended Subdiv. (10) to replace “Fireman” with “Firefighter”, effective July 1, 2001; P.A. 02-132 amended Subdiv. (9) by deleting provision re appointment under Sec. 54-104; P.A. 07-123 redefined “electronic defense weapon” in Subdiv. (20) to include “a stun gun or other conductive energy device”; pursuant to P.A. 11-51, “Department of Public Safety” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection” in Subdiv. (9), effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 13-170 redefined “peace officer” in Subdiv. (9) to include member of law enforcement unit of Mashantucket Pequot Tribe or Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut under certain conditions, effective June 25, 2013; P.A. 15-211 amended Subdiv. (9) by redefining “peace officer” to include United States marshal or deputy marshal, effective June 30, 2015; P.A. 19-108 redefined “peace officer” in Subdiv. (9); P.A. 21-31 redefined “electronic defense weapon” in Subdiv. (20) to delete requirement that the weapon not be capable of inflicting death or serious physical injury, effective July 1, 2021; P.A. 22-117 redefined “peace officer” in Subdiv. (9), effective May 27, 2022; P.A. 23-53 added Subdiv. (24) defining “serious firearm offense” and Subdiv. (25) defining “serious firearm offender”. Court correctly charged jury on definition of dangerous instrument. 173 C. 91. Subdiv. (3) compared to Subdiv. (4). 175 C. 204. Cited. 182 C. 501; 197 C. 574; 201 C. 505; 211 C. 258; 226 C. 514; 231 C. 545. Offense of carrying a dangerous weapon is not constitutionally overbroad in violation of the first and fourteenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution; defendant's threatened use of a table leg to inflict serious bodily injury against victim, in the event that victim continued to bother him, constitutes a violation of this section and Sec. 53-206 if the threat is found to be a true threat not protected by the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 287 C. 237. Evidence re use of pepper spray causing temporary blindness, chemical conjunctivitis and chemical burns constituted sufficient evidence of “serious physical injury” and “dangerous instrument” under section. 292 C. 533. Cited. 8 CA 545; 9 CA 686; 11 CA 665; 12 CA 221; Id., 225; 14 CA 10; Id., 67; 37 CA 338. Earlier jury instruction in earlier related case defining assault as the reduced ability to act as one would have otherwise acted did not prejudice jury. 71 CA 190. Cited. 35 CS 519; 37 CS 661; 38 CS 619; 39 CS 494; 40 CS 498; 43 CS 46. Subdiv. (1): “Human being” construed for purposes of murder statute in accordance with long-standing common-law principle that the term includes a fetus that has been born alive. 296 C. 622. Cited. 17 CA 326; 25 CA 586; judgment reversed, see 223 C. 492. Subdiv. (3): Cited. 171 C. 276; 197 C. 602. Cited. 3 CA 353; 5 CA 612; 10 CA 330; 14 CA 586; 17 CA 226; Id., 391; 23 CA 160; 26 CA 641; 28 CA 581; judgment reversed, see 226 C. 601; Id., 612; 37 CA 733; 41 CA 255; Id., 565; 43 CA 76; 45 CA 591. Subdiv. (4): Cited. 172 C. 275; 173 C. 389; 174 C. 604; 181 C. 406; 182 C. 66; 186 C. 654; 189 C. 303; 197 C. 602; 202 C. 463; 211 C. 441; 213 C. 593; 225 C. 450; 231 C. 115; 237 C. 748. “Disfigurement” as defined in Sec. 31-275(8) and used in the workers' compensation statutes, applies to the Penal Code for purposes of “serious physical injury” as defined in Subdiv. 332 C. 472. Cited. 5 CA 590; Id., 612; 6 CA 667; 8 CA 496; 10 CA 330; Id., 462; 11 CA 499; 14 CA 657; 15 CA 531; 16 CA 346; 17 CA 226; 19 CA 654; Id., 674; 21 CA 688; 23 CA 502; 25 CA 734; 26 CA 641; 28 CA 81; Id., 402; Id., 581; judgment reversed, see 226 C. 601; Id., 612; 29 CA 679; 30 CA 232; 33 CA 782; 34 CA 261; 38 CA 20; 39 CA 18; judgment reversed, see 237 C. 748; 41 CA 565; 42 CA 307; 45 CA 270; Id., 591. “Disfigurement” defined as that which impairs or injures beauty, symmetry or appearance of a person or which renders unsightly, misshapen or imperfect or deforms in some manner. 82 CA 684. Victim's testimony and medical records re injury that required surgical treatment, left victim with impairment to the use of her dominant hand and left victim's hand visibly scarred was sufficient to establish proof of serious physical injury. 116 CA 196. The jury reasonably could have concluded that scars constituted serious physical injury because they negatively affected the appearance of skin on face and abdomen. 118 CA 831. Subdiv. (5): Cited. 186 C. 654; 188 C. 653; 213 C. 593. Cited. 8 CA 667; 16 CA 346; 25 CA 734; 30 CA 406; judgment reversed, see 228 C. 335; 31 CA 58. Subdiv. (6): Cited. 169 C. 683; 171 C. 277; 175 C. 569; 177 C. 379; 179 C. 576; 182 C. 262; Id., 533; 185 C. 473; 189 C. 268; 190 C. 822; 195 C. 567; Id., 651; Id., 668; 197 C. 507; 203 C. 506. If a weapon from which a shot may be discharged is designed for violence and is capable of inflicting death or serious physical injury, it is a deadly weapon regardless of whether the shot is discharged by gunpowder. 278 C. 113. Cited. 7 CA 445; 19 CA 111; judgment reversed, see 215 C. 538; 21 CA 299; 25 CA 104; 29 CA 679; 31 CA 614; 33 CA 468; 39 CA 579; 45 CA 591. Trial court did not invade jury's fact-finding province when it ruled as a matter of law that BB gun in evidence was a deadly weapon under Subdiv. in this case. 110 CA 263. Subdiv. (7): Cited. 169 C. 683; 171 C. 277. Tire iron used to break into apartment is not a dangerous instrument per se; potential for injury considered only in conjunction with circumstances of actual or threatened use. 177 C. 140. Cited. 182 C. 533; 190 C. 822; 195 C. 668; 202 C. 629; 218 C. 432. A fist or other body part is not a dangerous instrument under definition. 307 C. 115. Cited. 5 CA 40; 6 CA 667; 7 CA 27; Id., 445; 10 CA 330; 14 CA 586; Id., 657; 15 CA 586; 17 CA 226; 21 CA 299; 25 CA 171; 28 CA 612; 29 CA 262; Id., 679; 33 CA 468; 38 CA 868; 45 CA 270. Jury reasonably could have found that defendant's “feet and footwear” were a “dangerous instrument” in the manner in which they were used because of defendant's above average size, the age and delicate health of the elderly victim, the continual kicking of such victim in the area of several vital organs and the force of the kicks which was intensified by the weight of the footwear. 74 CA 545. Dangerous instrument as defined in Subdiv. is “any instrument, article or substance which, under the circumstances in which it is used ... or threatened to be used, is capable of causing death or serious physical injury”. 81 CA 367. Evidence was sufficient to prove that a knife or similar instrument was used thereby constituting a dangerous instrument. 98 CA 13. Jury reasonably could have concluded that being stabbed with a hypodermic syringe potentially contaminated with a blood-borne pathogen constituted a dangerous instrument. 161 CA 379. Jury reasonably could have found that a PVC pipe, under the circumstances in which it was used, was a dangerous instrument capable of causing serious physical injury. 176 CA 807. Subdiv. (11): Cited. 171 C. 271; 178 C. 448; 180 C. 382; 182 C. 449; 184 C. 121; 186 C. 414; Id., 555; Id., 574; Id., 654; 188 C. 515; 189 C. 383; 190 C. 219; 194 C. 258; Id., 376; 195 C. 166; 198 C. 92; 199 C. 1; 201 C. 489; 202 C. 520; Id., 629; 204 C. 1; 209 C. 290; 214 C. 77; 216 C. 585; 219 C. 16; Id., 363; Id., 489; 220 C. 285; 223 C. 595; Id., 674; 225 C. 55; Id., 114; 227 C. 456; 228 C. 62; Id., 118; Id., 281; 229 C. 328; 231 C. 115; 233 C. 215; 235 C. 274; Id., 477; 236 C. 189; 237 C. 748; 238 C. 253. Cited. 5 CA 599; 7 CA 180; 9 CA 111; Id., 373; 11 CA 24; 16 CA 455; 19 CA 674; 24 CA 598; 27 CA 103; 28 CA 81; 34 CA 223; 35 CA 51; 36 CA 417; 39 CA 18; judgment reversed, see 237 C. 748; 40 CA 643; 41 CA 361; 45 CA 297. Provision dealing with intent to engage in proscribed conduct is irrelevant to a murder prosecution pursuant to Sec. 53a-54a. 48 CA 677. Meaning of acting “intentionally”. 51 CA 345. Portion of the definition of “intent” relating to intent to engage in proscribed conduct is not relevant to charge of assault in the second degree. 70 CA 855. State sufficiently proved defendant had conscious objective to cause victim's face to be scarred where defendant butted victim's face with his head, bit her face, struck her on the head with a hairdryer, kicked her and attempted to choke her, resulting in scars to victim's face. 74 CA 633. Although court improperly instructed jury on entire definition re attempted murder and kidnapping charge, it properly instructed that jury had to find that defendant intended to cause the death of another or intended to abduct and restrain another. 97 CA 837. Definition embraces both specific intent to cause a result and general intent to engage in proscribed conduct, and it is improper for court to refer in its instruction to entire definitional language, including the intent to engage in conduct, when the charge relates to a crime requiring only the intent to cause a specific result. 99 CA 230. Although court instructed jury regarding intent by using the full statutory definition including portion relating to general intent crimes, it was not reasonably possible that jury was misled by court's instructions because court gave numerous proper instructions regarding proper intent required for crime of attempt to commit assault in the first degree. 107 CA 517. Subdiv. (12): Cited. 182 C. 449; 203 C. 682; 223 C. 595; 235 C. 477. Cited. 5 CA 599; 11 CA 24; 13 CA 288; 16 CA 455; 40 CA 643. Subdiv. (13): Cited. 171 C. 271; 180 C. 382; 182 C. 66; Id., 449; 184 C. 400; 185 C. 63; 186 C. 265; 187 C. 6; 193 C. 632; 195 C. 232; 198 C. 92; Id., 454; 199 C. 1; 202 C. 629; 212 C. 593; 213 C. 579; 214 C. 57; 216 C. 585; 219 C. 16; 222 C. 444; 225 C. 55; 226 C. 20; 228 C. 147; 231 C. 115; 233 C. 174. Cited. 5 CA 40; Id., 571; 7 CA 180; 11 CA 24; Id., 473; 17 CA 502; judgment reversed, see 213 C. 579; 19 CA 674; 26 CA 331; Id., 448; 27 CA 73; Id., 322; 30 CA 95; judgment reversed, see 228 C. 147; 34 CA 807; 35 CA 51; 41 CA 333. Statute applies an objective yardstick to measure the nature and degree of the risk and a subjective yardstick to measure defendant's awareness of the risk. 35 CS 570. Subdiv. (14): Cited. 171 C. 112; 176 C. 451; 180 C. 382; 182 C. 449; 187 C. 6; 195 C. 232; 201 C. 174; 202 C. 520; Id., 629; 204 C. 410; Id., 429; 212 C. 593; 213 C. 579; 214 C. 57; 222 C. 444; 226 C. 20; 228 C. 147; 231 C. 115; 238 C. 253; 242 C. 211. Cited. 5 CA 40; 11 CA 473; Id., 499; 17 CA 502; judgment reversed, see 213 C. 579; 23 CA 720; 26 CA 448; 29 CA 825; 30 CA 95; judgment reversed, see 228 C. 147. Subdiv. (18): Cited. 195 C. 651; 196 C. 395; 197 C. 507; 205 C. 370; 231 C. 235. Cited. 7 CA 726; 9 CA 169; judgment reversed, see 205 C. 370; Id., 330; 19 CA 48; Id., 111; 36 CA 805; 37 CA 672; 39 CA 502. Subdiv. (19): Cited. 175 C. 569; 190 C. 715; 196 C. 395. “Firearm” includes BB. gun; legislature could have restricted the term “firearm” to guns that use gunpowder to discharge their shots, and the fact that legislature elected not to do so is strong evidence that it did not intend to limit the term in that manner. 294 C. 151. Cited. 3 CA 289; 19 CA 48; Id., 111; 21 CA 299; 34 CA 751; judgment reversed, see 233 C. 211; 38 CA 481; 39 CA 82; Id., 502; 45 CA 591. Subdiv. does not require state to establish that ammunition recovered with handgun was capable of being discharged from the handgun, and use of other ammunition was permitted to establish that handgun was a weapon from which a shot may be discharged. 127 CA 377. Although gun was not operable at time of testing, that responding officer was able to dry fire it at time of seizure and observe that firing mechanism was functional was sufficient to prove operability. 146 CA 844. Replica antique pistol that propelled via gunpowder a shot that mortally wounded defendant's spouse constituted a pistol, revolver or other weapon from which a shot could be discharged, as defined by Subdiv. 49 CS 248.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 53a-1
Short title: Penal Code.§ 53a-10
Defense.§ 53a-100
Definitions.§ 53a-100aa
Home invasion: Class A felony.§ 53a-104
Affirmative defense to burglary.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 53a-3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/53a-3.