Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-572c — Parent-child immunity abrogated in certain negligence actions.
Connecticut § 52-572c
This text of Connecticut § 52-572c (Parent-child immunity abrogated in certain negligence actions.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572c (2026).
Text
In all actions for negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle, and in all actions accruing on or after October 1, 1979, for negligence in the operation of an aircraft or vessel, as defined in section 15-127, resulting in personal injury, wrongful death or injury to property, the immunity between parent and child in such negligence action brought by a parent against his child or by or on behalf of a child against his parent is abrogated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Munn v. Hotchkiss School
24 F. Supp. 3d 155 (D. Connecticut, 2014)
Szollosy v. Hyatt Corp.
208 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
Szollosy Ex Rel. Szollosy v. Hyatt Corp.
396 F. Supp. 2d 147 (D. Connecticut, 2005)
Norwood v. Gordon, No. Lpl-Cv-96-0472232s (Apr. 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 4554 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Legislative History
(1967, P.A. 596, S. 1; P.A. 79-5.) History: P.A. 79-5 removed obsolete reference to actions accruing after July 1, 1967, for negligence in operation of motor vehicle and applied section to actions for negligence in operation of aircraft or vessel accruing on or after October 1, 1979. In absence of express statutory exceptions, doctrine of parental immunity from actions at law by child prevail. 157 C. 445. Cited. 200 C. 290; 207 C. 518; 224 C. 483; 230 C. 472; 234 C. 259. Doctrine of parental immunity bars action to recover for personal injuries sustained by child as result of fire that occurred at the home of child's noncustodial parent during a scheduled visit. 244 C. 692. “Operator of motor vehicle” for purposes of statute discussed. 9 CA 290. Cited. 20 CA 619; 34 CA 866.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-572c, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-572c.