Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-57 — Manner of service upon individuals, municipalities, corporations, partnerships and voluntary associations.
Connecticut § 52-57
This text of Connecticut § 52-57 (Manner of service upon individuals, municipalities, corporations, partnerships and voluntary associations.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-57 (2026).
Text
(a)Except as otherwise provided, process in any civil action shall be served by leaving a true and attested copy of it, including the declaration or complaint, with the defendant, or at his usual place of abode, in this state.
(b)Process in civil actions against the following-described classes of defendants shall be served as follows:
(1)Against a town, upon its clerk, assistant clerk, manager or one of its selectmen;
(2)against a city, upon its clerk or assistant clerk or upon its mayor or manager;
(3)against a borough, upon its manager, clerk or assistant clerk or upon the warden or one of its burgesses;
(4)against a school district, upon its clerk or one of its committee;
(5)against a board, commission, department or agency of a town, city or borough, notwithstanding any provisio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Roberti (In Re Roberti)
183 B.R. 991 (D. Connecticut, 1995)
Accashian v. City of Danbury, No. X01 Cv 97 0147228s (Jan. 6, 1998)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 772 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Forlano v. Ho, No. Cv 00-0444335 (Feb. 14, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 2463 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
F.G.B. Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Doe, No. Spbr-9409 27848 (Apr. 17, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4180 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Riverdale Associates v. Fehrs, No. Spnh 9510 44819 (Dec. 13, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 14683 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Fry Steele Co. v. James Enterprises, Inc., No. Cv92 29 45 21 (May 29, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5270 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Danbury photo/graphic Sup. v. Graphic, No. Cv90 026 99 19s (Aug. 8, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 8829 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Brown v. Brookville Transport Ltd., No. 392820 (Feb. 18, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 2140 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Zimmerman v. Zimmerman, No. Fa00-0339869s (Apr. 9, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 5055 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Smith v. McKeough, No. 123757 (Aug. 15, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 10486 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Gyadu v. Apl Automotive Consulting, No. Cv97-0138541 (Jun. 11, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6930 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Channer v. Davenport Surety Co., No. Cv 96-0565178 (Oct. 31, 2001)
2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 14867-b (Connecticut Superior Court, 2001)
Li v. Peck
(D. Connecticut, 2022)
North American Co for Life & Health Ins v. Pouncey
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Rogers v. Middletown
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
LINK GROUP INTERN., LLP v. Toymax (HK) Ltd.
127 F. Supp. 2d 280 (D. Connecticut, 2000)
Charbonneau v. Charbonneau, No. Fa 97 0056898 S (Nov. 24, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11363 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Cadle Company v. Appeal From Probate, No. Cv02 039 55 56 S (Nov. 19, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 15224 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Pileggi v. Mathias
(D. Connecticut, 2024)
Coke v. Samalot
(D. Connecticut, 2021)
Legislative History
(1949 Rev., S. 7774; 1955, S. 3149d; 1959, P.A. 152, S. 73; P.A. 73-50; P.A. 82-160, S. 15; P.A. 83-445; P.A. 85-303, S. 1, 5; P.A. 89-195, S. 5; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 92-6, S. 106, 117; P.A. 96-271, S. 217, 254; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-1, S. 69, 75; P.A. 03-19, S. 116; 03-224, S. 8; 03-278, S. 126; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-3, S. 97; P.A. 04-76, S. 56; 04-78, S. 3; P.A. 05-288, S. 175; P.A. 11-214, S. 29; P.A. 15-71, S. 90; P.A. 19-40, S. 14; 19-118, S. 38.) History: 1959 act deleted provisions for actions against county, county commissioners and county clerks, county government having been abolished; P.A. 73-50 allowed service to be made upon an assistant vice president and upon attorneys of foreign corporations appointed pursuant to Sec. 33-400 rather than upon “resident” attorneys of such corporations appointed pursuant to Sec. 33-138; P.A. 82-160 inserted Subsec. indicators, added Subsec. (d) concerning service upon partnerships which was formerly Sec. 52-57b, and added Subsec. (e) concerning service upon voluntary associations which was formerly Sec. 52-59; P.A. 83-445 specified that copy of writ and complaint be mailed to partners “named in writ”; P.A. 85-303 substituted reference to corporation's attorney for reference to corporation's agent in Subsec. (c) and raised fee for service of process upon secretary of the state from $5 to $10; P.A. 89-195 added Subsec. (f) re service of process in actions concerning child support orders where other methods of service of process cannot be effected; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 92-6 amended Subsec. (e) to raise fee from $10 to $25; P.A. 96-271 amended Subsec. (c) to replace reference to Sec. 33-400 with Sec. 33-922, effective January 1, 1997; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-1 added reference to Secs. 46b-212 to 46b-213v, inclusive, to Subsec. (f), effective January 1, 1998 (Revisor's note: References in Subsec. (f) to Secs. “17b-115” and “17b-693” were replaced editorially by the Revisors with “17b-616” and “17b-689b”, respectively, and the word “to” preceding “17b-693” was deleted to reflect repeal of Secs. 17b-115, 17b-689a and 17b-690 to 17b-693, inclusive); P.A. 03-19 made a technical change in Subsec. (f), effective May 12, 2003; P.A. 03-224 amended Subsec. (b) by adding new Subdiv. (5) re service on municipal board, commission, department or agency, redesignating existing Subdiv. (5) as Subdiv. (6) and adding Subdiv. (7) re service on municipal employee, effective July 2, 2003; P.A. 03-278 amended Subsec. (b) by deleting Subdiv. (5)(B) re service on clerk, chief presiding officer or executive head of municipal board, commission, department or agency, deleting Subdiv. (7)(B) re service on municipal employee pursuant to Subsec. (a) and making technical changes, effective July 9, 2003; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-3, in repealing Secs. 17b-19, 17b-62 to 17b-65, inclusive, 17b-116, 17b-116a, 17b-116b, 17b-117, 17b-120, 17b-121, 17b-123, 17b-134, 17b-135, 17b-220, 17b-259 and 17b-287, authorized deletion of internal references to said section in this section, effective March 1, 2004; P.A. 04-76 amended Subsec. (f) by deleting references to Secs. 17b-118b and 17b-221 that were repealed by the same act; P.A. 04-78 amended Subsec. (b)(5) by replacing “any provision of the general statutes” with “any provision of law”; P.A. 05-288 made technical changes in Subsec. (b), effective July 13, 2005; P.A. 11-214 amended Subsec. (f) to substitute reference to Sec. 46b-213w for reference to Sec. 46b-213v and make a technical change; P.A. 15-71 amended Subsec. (f) by replacing reference to Secs. 46b-212 to 46b-213w with reference to Secs. 46b-301 to 46b-425, effective July 1, 2015; P.A. 19-40 amended Subsec. (e) by replacing fee of $25 with fee of $50 and making technical changes, effective July 1, 2019; P.A. 19-118 amended Subsec. (f) by deleting reference to Sec. 17b-256, effective July 1, 2019. Action against U.S. corporations. 5 C. 105. Secretary de facto. 6 C. 528. Service at selectman's house. 12 C. 92. A foreign corporation, a portion of whose stockholders reside in this state, held not liable to suit by writ of summons in our courts. 14 C. 301. Service when there are no officers and but one stockholder. 20 C. 447. Place where corporation, etc., exercises its powers. 40 C. 70. Appearance as waiving defects in service. 67 C. 366; 70 C. 329; 77 C. 382; 90 C. 293; 4 Cranch 421. Effect of acceptance of service by nonresident out of state. 89 C. 215. House in this state where one habitually spent 3 days a week held his usual place of abode. 92 C. 55. Service by registered mail not sufficient to make nonresident claimant of bank deposit a party to action by trustee in bankruptcy against bank to recover it. 97 C. 307. Requirements of jurisdiction by foreign attachment stated. 107 C. 554. Service pursuant to section sufficient to give jurisdiction in bastardy action. 118 C. 304. Cited. 121 C. 312; 127 C. 57. Service at door of S's apartment is not service at “usual place of abode” of F; officer's return may be contradicted and facts shown to be otherwise. 138 C. 343. Due to legislative history, words “aforesaid officers or agents” construed to permit service upon a resident director of a foreign corporation. 144 C. 212. Court does not have jurisdiction if service is improper; when persons upon whom service may be made are designated by statute, service upon any other person as a representative of the corporations is inadequate. 145 C. 24. In the case of a defendant domiciled in, but absent from, the state, abode service in the state is ordinarily sufficient to give the court in personam jurisdiction; section is applicable to divorce and legal separation actions. 150 C. 15. Cited. Id., 190; 181 C. 225. Without a finding that plaintiff had no notice in fact, the attack on statute permitting abode service failed. 185 C. 495. Cited. 192 C. 1; Id., 497; 196 C. 233; 206 C. 125; Id., 374; 212 C. 157; 214 C. 1; 219 C. 204; 226 C. 1; 227 C. 909; 232 C. 392. Cited. 1 CA 123; 4 CA 339; 6 CA 43; Id., 390; 10 CA 201; 13 CA 1; 21 CA 339; 25 CA 637; 31 CA 155; Id., 629; 34 CA 18; Id., 634; 44 CA 225. Cited. 4 CS 139; 9 CS 473; Id., 520. Must be read as though there was a comma between the word “agent” and the concluding phrase “or upon any director resident in this state” to denote that the qualifying phrase “resident in this state” refers only to directors. 12 CS 97. Service handed to a clerk at a desk in a hotel lobby held void. 14 CS 400. Writ to which was added names of two additional garnishees after service is abatable. 16 CS 143. Service at home of defendant while he was hospitalized held “at usual place of abode”. 17 CS 432. Attempted service on corporation by leaving copy of complaint with porter invalid where no showing that the officers could not be found. 18 CS 108. Service of process upon the secretary of a foreign corporation who is in this state does not give our courts jurisdiction over the corporation unless it has exposed itself to such jurisdiction by doing business in this state. Id., 387. Service of process at a residence owned by defendant and occupied by a tenant, and in which defendant had an office, was not at defendant's usual place of abode and was a nullity. 22 CS 288. What constitutes “usual place of abode”. 24 CS 324. Writ placed halfway under door was service at “usual place of abode”. Id., 488. Personal service need not have been made in a legal separation action where a proper constructive attachment of the property involved was made at the outset of the action. 26 CS 284, 290. Cited. 27 CS 395. Service by leaving process at house which defendant had vacated 3 months previously and put up for sale, herself moving out of state, was not service at her “usual place of abode, in this state”. 28 CS 284. Defendant's former residence, still his family's residence and listed as his voting and licensure address was no longer his place of abode when he had for over 2 years worked and lived in England. Id., 359. Cited. 33 CS 554; Id., 562; 34 CS 501; 35 CS 297. Hotel room may be defendant's usual place of abode, particularly where he receives actual notice of the action. 36 CS 335. Cited. 37 CS 790; 41 CS 367; 42 CS 187. Service on Connecticut travel agency to secure jurisdiction over foreign hotel corporation whose only contact with state was travel agency selling tickets for tour on which hotel was regular stop, held ineffective. 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 403. Cited. 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 470. Personal service of writ conferred in personam jurisdiction over defendant although writ did not specify defendant's address by street and number. 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 235. Requirement of statute for “abode” service is to be strictly construed as it is a departure from common law requirement of manual delivery for in personam service; service of writ by leaving it in mail box in hallway outside defendant's apartment is so haphazard and uncertain as to fail to meet statutory requirements. Id., 580. Cited. 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 54. Subsec. (a): In foreclosure action, service of process at residential address when defendant was incarcerated constituted service at place of abode because family of defendant continued to live at address and defendant returned there after release from prison. 288 C. 568. Abode service is not effective if it is left at address that is not the usual address of the party to be served. 78 CA 456. In light of facts that front door of defendants' home was inaccessible, that marshal affixed the process to property's main entryway, and that the property is a single-family residence and defendants actually received notice of the action, the service of process effected by the marshal was reasonably likely to achieve personal notice and constituted proper abode service pursuant to section. 98 CA 852. Unlike Sec. 52-64(a), this Subsec. only applies when a state employee is sued in his or her individual capacity; phrase “Except as otherwise provided” does not allow service of process on a state employee in his or her individual capacity by serving process on the Attorney General at the Office of the Attorney General because such process is not specifically enumerated in section. 163 CA 337; judgment affirmed, see 328 C. 248. Subsec. (b): Court properly dismissed suit against board of education as a result of improper service of process under Subdiv. (4), as service of process to board secretary should have been made under Subdiv. (5) and served upon the clerk of town, city or borough. 191 CA 280. Subdiv. (5): Although citation commanded the marshal to serve only one copy on clerk, not the two copies required by Subdiv., the marshal did leave two copies, and thus defect is formal and circumstantial and will not cause dismissal of the appeal. 50 CS 513. Subsec. (c): In action against foreign corporation, service of process may be made on vice president and court acquired personal jurisdiction over defendant corporation by service on vice president made in accordance with Subsec. 113 CA 845. Service on general manager constituted proper service in action against automobile dealer. 142 CA 14. Subsec. (d): Service on secretary does not fulfill requirements of statute. 40 CS 1.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-57.