Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-552h — Remedies of creditors.
(a)In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under sections 52-552a to 52-552 l, inclusive, a creditor, subject to the limitations in section 52-552i, may obtain:
(1)Avoidance of the transfer or obligation to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor's claim;
(2)an attachment or other provisional remedy against the asset transferred or other property of the transferee in accordance with the procedure prescribed by chapter 903a;
(3)subject to applicable principles of equity and in accordance with applicable rules of civil procedure (A) an injunction against further disposition by the debtor or a transferee, or both, of the asset transferred or of other property, (B) appointment of a receiver to take charge of the asset transferred or of other property of the transferee
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Connecticut § 52-552h (Remedies of creditors.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daly v. Deptula (In Re Carrozzella & Richardson)
286 B.R. 480 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
Nastro v. D'ONOFRIO
263 F. Supp. 2d 446 (D. Connecticut, 2003)
Daly v. Fusco (In Re All-Type Printing Inc.)
274 B.R. 316 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
Epperson v. Entertainment Express, Inc.
338 F. Supp. 2d 328 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Daly v. Kennedy (In Re Kennedy)
279 B.R. 455 (D. Connecticut, 2002)
O'Neil v. New Eng. Rd., Inc. (In re Neri Bros. Constr. Corp.)
593 B.R. 100 (D. Connecticut, 2018)
Cendant Corp. v. Shelton
473 F. Supp. 2d 307 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
Daly v. Richardson (In re Richardson)
268 B.R. 331 (D. Connecticut, 2001)
Raytech Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (In re Raytech Corp.)
241 B.R. 790 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
In Re Sbriglio
306 B.R. 445 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Chemical Bank v. Coan
2 F. App'x 180 (Second Circuit, 2001)
William M. Anderson - Adversary Proceeding
(D. Connecticut, 2020)
Chemical Bank v. Dana
234 B.R. 585 (D. Connecticut, 1999)
J. P. Castagna, Inc. v. Castagna, No. Cv920523960 (Apr. 7, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3634 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Legislative History
(P.A. 91-297, S. 8.) Plain language of section demonstrates that Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act was enacted specifically to expand range of a creditor's remedies beyond the common-law property and proceeds rule; section does not vest court with unfettered discretion to award damages to creditors who have failed to avail themselves of all the protections afforded under the act. 266 C. 1. Cited. 46 CA 199. Trial court's order of relief allowing plaintiff to attach defendants' property and levy execution thereon was well within court's authority to grant under section after finding of liability for a fraudulent transfer. 201 CA 774.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.