Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-549n — Certain contract actions referred to fact-finders. Rules of procedure.
Connecticut § 52-549n
This text of Connecticut § 52-549n (Certain contract actions referred to fact-finders. Rules of procedure.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-549n (2026).
Text
In accordance with the provisions of section 51-14, the judges of the Superior Court may make such rules as they deem necessary to provide a procedure in accordance with which the court, in its discretion, may refer to a fact-finder for proceedings authorized pursuant to this chapter, any contract action pending in the Superior Court, except claims under insurance contracts for uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, in which only money damages are claimed and which is based upon an express or implied promise to pay a definite sum, and in which the amount, legal interest or property in controversy is less than fifty thousand dollars exclusive of interest and costs. Such cases may be referred to a fact-finder only after the certificate of closed pleadings has been filed, no claim for
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Recycled Paper Greetings, Inc. v. Levine, No. Cv 98-0411577 (Apr. 19, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5160 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Harris v. Harris, No. Cv 98-0408497 (Jan. 3, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 20 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Southern New England Telephone v. Shah, No. Cv 98 041 43 27 (Jul. 22, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 10198 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
F W Welding Service v. Rac Cons., No. Cv95-0374277s (Apr. 15, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 4497 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Yale New Haven Hospital v. Sanders, No. Cv 98 041 3848 (Aug. 13, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 11465 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Legislative History
(P.A. 81-462, S. 8, 13; P.A. 82-441, S. 1, 13, 23; P.A. 97-24, S. 1, 7; 97-40, S. 6; P.A. 15-118, S. 64.) History: P.A. 82-441 deleted provisions re arbitration of civil actions and substituted provisions re rules of procedure for fact-finding in certain contract actions, and postponed effective date of section from July 1, 1982, to July 1, 1983; P.A. 97-24 added exception for uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, increased limit for amount in controversy from less than $15,000 to less than $50,000 and, using language identical to that in P.A. 97-40, made change in procedure by requiring filing of certificate of closed pleadings, effective January 1, 1998; P.A. 97-40 required filing of certificate of closed pleadings; P.A. 15-118 made a technical change. Cited. 199 C. 496; 237 C. 758. Cited. 5 CA 469; 12 CA 348; 15 CA 185; Id., 194; 17 CA 294; 20 CA 420; 24 CA 223; 28 CA 693; Id., 693; 35 CA 353; 38 CA 772; 42 CA 763.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-549n, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-549n.