Connecticut Statutes

§ 52-278f — Issuance of prejudgment remedy when defendant in commercial transaction has waived notice and hearing.

Connecticut § 52-278f
JurisdictionConnecticut
Title 52Civil Actions
Ch. 903aPrejudgment Remedies

This text of Connecticut § 52-278f (Issuance of prejudgment remedy when defendant in commercial transaction has waived notice and hearing.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-278f (2026).

Text

In an action upon a commercial transaction, as defined in section 52-278a, wherein the defendant has waived his right to a notice and hearing under sections 52-278a to 52-278g, inclusive, the attorney for the plaintiff shall issue the writ for a prejudgment remedy without securing a court order provided that (1) the complaint shall set forth a copy of the waiver;

(2)the plaintiff shall file an affidavit sworn to by the plaintiff or any competent affiant setting forth a statement of facts sufficient to show that there is probable cause that a judgment in the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, or in an amount greater than the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, taking into account any known defenses, counterclaims or set-offs, will be rendered in the matter in favor of the plaint

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Isban
870 F. Supp. 24 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
2 case citations
Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Garofalo, No. Cv97 034 035 5s (May 1, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 5718 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Case v. Sablone, No. Cv92-050 93 09 S (Mar. 7, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2467 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Investors Capital Corp. v. Connecticut National Bank
824 F. Supp. 309 (D. Connecticut, 1993)

Legislative History

(P.A. 73-431, S. 6, 8; P.A. 91-315, S. 2, 5; P.A. 93-431, S. 4, 10.) History: P.A. 91-315 added Subdiv. (2) requiring the plaintiff to file an affidavit setting forth facts showing there is probable cause to sustain his claim and Subdiv. (3) requiring the plaintiff to provide a notice to the defendant satisfying the requirements of Sec. 52-278e(b); P.A. 93-431 amended Subdiv. (2) to require the affidavit to contain facts sufficient to show that there is probable cause “that a judgment in the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, or in an amount greater than the amount of the prejudgment remedy sought, taking into account any known defenses, counterclaims or set-offs, will be rendered in the matter in favor of the plaintiff” rather than that there is probable cause “to sustain the validity of the plaintiff's claim” and amended Subdiv. (3) to add reference to Sec. 52-278e(c), effective January 1, 1994. Cited. 172 C. 577; 176 C. 432; 181 C. 524; 184 C. 85; 188 C. 69; 208 C. 13; 222 C. 361; 226 C. 773; 238 C. 778. Cited. 14 CA 579; 28 CA 809; 29 CA 48; 32 CA 118; 42 CA 763; 46 CA 399. Cited. 38 CS 98.

Nearby Sections

15
View on official source ↗

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-278f, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-278f.