Connecticut Statutes
§ 52-278b — Availability of prejudgment remedy.
Connecticut § 52-278b
This text of Connecticut § 52-278b (Availability of prejudgment remedy.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-278b (2026).
Text
Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes to the contrary, no prejudgment remedy shall be available to a person in any action at law or equity (1) unless he has complied with the provisions of sections 52-278a to 52-278g, inclusive, except an action upon a commercial transaction wherein the defendant has executed a waiver as provided in section 52-278f, or (2) for the garnishment of earnings as defined in subdivision (5) of section 52-350a.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bahrain Telecommunications Co. v. Discoverytel, Inc.
476 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D. Connecticut, 2007)
In Re Morzella
171 B.R. 485 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
Davila v. Secure Pharmacy Plus
329 F. Supp. 2d 311 (D. Connecticut, 2004)
Danmar Associates v. Porter
43 B.R. 423 (D. Connecticut, 1984)
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Isban
870 F. Supp. 24 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
State v. Philip Morris, Inc., No. X02 Cv 96 0148414 S (Oct. 27, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 12726 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Ford v. Store Twenty Four, Inc., No. Cv 99 042 45 50 (Apr. 23, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5359 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Emerson v. Colon, No. Pjr Cv-96-0559867-S (Oct. 28, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 10867 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)
Hyman v. Perillie, No. Cv 97-0405539 (Nov. 2, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13561 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Legislative History
(P.A. 73-431, S. 2, 8; P.A. 90-149, S. 2.) History: P.A. 90-149 added Subdiv. (2) prohibiting the garnishment of earnings as a prejudgment remedy. Cited. 176 C. 432; 181 C. 524; 184 C. 85; 188 C. 69; 208 C. 13; 222 C. 361; Id., 541; 232 C. 216. Cited. 1 CA 188; 4 CA 510; 14 CA 579; 28 CA 809; 32 CA 118; 33 CA 223; 34 CA 801; 46 CA 399. Cited. 38 CS 98. Subdiv. (2): Since commissions a real estate salesperson receive are debts accruing by reason of personal service, they are “earnings” under Sec. 52-350a(5) and are exempt from garnishment in a prejudgment remedy application. 50 CS 460.
Nearby Sections
15
§ 52-109
Substituted plaintiff.Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Connecticut § 52-278b, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/ct/52-278b.