California Statutes
§ 340.6. — 340.6. (Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 13, Sec. 2.)
California·Code CCP Code of Civil Procedure - CCP·Title 2.·Part 2. TITLE 2. OF THE TIME OF COMMENCING CIVIL ACTIONS·Ch. 3. CHAPTER 3. The Time of Commencing Actions Other Than for the Recovery of Real Property
(a)An action against an attorney for a wrongful act or omission, other than for actual fraud, arising in the performance of professional services shall be commenced within one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the facts constituting the wrongful act or omission, or four years from the date of the wrongful act or omission, whichever occurs first. If the plaintiff is required to establish the plaintiff’s factual innocence for an underlying criminal charge as an element of
the plaintiff’s claim, the action shall be commenced within two years after the plaintiff achieves postconviction exoneration in the form of a final judicial disposition of the criminal case. Except for a claim for which the plaintiff is required to
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California § 340.6. (340.6. (Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 13, Sec. 2.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Esg Capital Partners v. Venable LLP
828 F.3d 1023 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
3123 Smb LLC v. Steven Horn
880 F.3d 461 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Graham-Sult v. Clainos
756 F.3d 724 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Vafi v. McCloskey
193 Cal. App. 4th 874 (California Court of Appeal, 2011)
Mula v. Mula-Stouky
(N.D. California, 2022)
Gary Rand v. Midland National Life Insurance
(C.D. California, 2019)
Jackson v. Calone
(E.D. California, 2019)
Dickerson v. Contra Costa County
(N.D. California, 2023)
Schrader Cellars, LLC v. Roach
(N.D. California, 2023)
Rouse v. Abernathy
(N.D. California, 2022)
Dang v. Pontier
(S.D. California, 2020)
Selene Finance, LP v. County of Sacramento
(E.D. California, 2025)
Alexander Graham-Sult v. Nicholas Clainos
(Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Robert Baker v. Dykema Gossett, LLP
(Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Heller Ehrman LLP
(N.D. California, 2020)
Paravue Corp. v. Heller Ehrman LLP
(Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Davis v. Dwyer CA2/3
(California Court of Appeal, 2014)
Bohm Wildish & Matsen v. Selfridge CA4/3
(California Court of Appeal, 2020)
Scofield v. Hanson Bridgett LLP CA3
(California Court of Appeal, 2021)
Profitt v. Tauches
(N.D. California, 2021)
Legislative History
Amended by Stats. 2019, Ch. 13, Sec. 2. (AB 692) Effective January 1, 2020.