Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Young v. State

306 S.W.3d 711, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, 2010 WL 1608679

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 6, 2010

DocketWD 71069

StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 711 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. State, 306 S.W.3d 711, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, 2010 WL 1608679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Young appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Young claims that the trial court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because counsel advised him that he would likely receive probation. He contends that but for this advice he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Robert Young appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Young claims that the trial court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because counsel advised him that he would likely receive probation. He contends that but for this advice he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 711, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, 2010 WL 1608679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-moctapp-2010.