Young v. State

243 S.W.3d 492, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 50, 2008 WL 124003
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Young v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2008·No. No. ED 89431·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Young appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Young argues that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel. We find that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 243 S.W.3d 492, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 50, 2008 WL 124003 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

243 S.W.3d 492 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.