Young v. State
239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2007 WL 4166043
This text of 239 S.W.3d 170 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Young v. State, 239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2007 WL 4166043 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
ORDER
Antoine E. Young appeals the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barfield v. State
239 S.W.3d 170 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2007 WL 4166043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-moctapp-2007.