Young v. State
239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2007 WL 4166043
Opinion
ORDER
Antoine E. Young appeals the motion court’s denial without an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Young v. State, 239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1615, 2007 WL 4166043 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
239 S.W.3d 170 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barfield v. State
239 S.W.3d 170 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)