Barfield v. State
This text of 239 S.W.3d 170 (Barfield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Terrence Barfield, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate his mental state at the time of entering his guilty pleas.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 2007 WL 4166041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barfield-v-state-moctapp-2007.