Barfield v. State

239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 2007 WL 4166041
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2007·No. ED 89297·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Terrence Barfield, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate his mental state at the time of entering his guilty pleas.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barfield v. State, 239 S.W.3d 170, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616, 2007 WL 4166041 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

239 S.W.3d 170 (Barfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. State
239 S.W.3d 170 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)