Young v. State

331 S.W.3d 358, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 157, 2011 WL 533710
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 2011·No. ED 94594·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie Young appeals from the denial of his amended motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No- error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a -memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 331 S.W.3d 358, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 157, 2011 WL 533710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

331 S.W.3d 358 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Division of Employment Security
331 S.W.3d 358 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)