Young v. State

348 S.W.3d 182, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 2011 WL 4369240
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 20, 2011·No. ED95148·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Young appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young v. State, 348 S.W.3d 182, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 2011 WL 4369240 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

348 S.W.3d 182 (Young v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brooks
348 S.W.3d 182 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)