State v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brooks

348 S.W.3d 182, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2011 WL 4369311

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 20, 2011·No. ED 95246·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Brooks appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of child molestation in the first degree.

*183 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Brooks appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of child molestation in the first degree.

*183 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Brooks, 348 S.W.3d 182, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2011 WL 4369311 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

348 S.W.3d 182 (State v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related