Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Young v. State

357 S.W.3d 319, 2012 WL 265939, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 135

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 2012

DocketWD 73783

StatusPublished

This text of 357 S.W.3d 319 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Young v. State, 357 S.W.3d 319, 2012 WL 265939, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 135 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Young, an inmate, filed a pro se suit seeking a declaratory judgment that he be released on parole on December 30, 2010. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment and the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the State and denied Young’s motion.

We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Young, an inmate, filed a pro se suit seeking a declaratory judgment that he be released on parole on December 30, 2010. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment and the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the State and denied Young’s motion.

We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 S.W.3d 319, 2012 WL 265939, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack