In Re Aac

357 S.W.3d 319, 2012 WL 270690
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
DocketWD 74019
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 S.W.3d 319 (In Re Aac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Aac, 357 S.W.3d 319, 2012 WL 270690 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

357 S.W.3d 319 (2012)

In the Interest of: A.A.C., Plaintiff,
Juvenile Officer, Respondent,
Missouri Children's Division, Respondent,
v.
R.C.C. (Father), Appellant,
M.L.M.P. (Mother), Defendant.

No. WD 74019.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 31, 2012.

Jill R. Creed, for Respondent Juvenile Officer.

Toni M. Hendricks, for Respondent Missouri Children's Division.

Karen E. Bickel, for Appellant.

Before Division Three: JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge and JAMES E. WELSH, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

R.C.C. (Father) appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental *320 rights to his biological daughter, A.C.C. (Child). In his five points on appeal. Father asserts errors in the trial court's findings of grounds for termination under sections 211.447.5(3) and 211.447.5(6), RSMo Cum.Supp.2011. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. State
357 S.W.3d 319 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 S.W.3d 319, 2012 WL 270690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-aac-moctapp-2012.