Hall v. Division of Employment Security

331 S.W.3d 358, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 173
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 2011·No. ED 95059·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackie Hall (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying his petition for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred in finding he committed misconduct by refusing to follow an order of his supervisor.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An *359 opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall v. Division of Employment Security, 331 S.W.3d 358, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 173 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

331 S.W.3d 358 (Hall v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. State
331 S.W.3d 358 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)