Williams v. State

519 S.W.3d 816, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 825, 2017 WL 770955
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. ED 103600·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Belvin Williams (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. This Court affirmed his convictions of one count of assault in the first degree, one count of robbery in the first degree, and two counts of armed criminal action; he was sentenced to four consecutive terms of 30 years’ imprisonment. State v. Williams, 427 S.W.3d 259 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 519 S.W.3d 816, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 825, 2017 WL 770955 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

519 S.W.3d 816 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Steele
E.D. Missouri, 2021