Williams v. State

436 S.W.3d 254, 2014 WL 3408259, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 771
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 778
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 15, 2014·No. No. WD 76580·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Kevin Williams was convicted of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action following a bench trial. Williams moved for postconviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 29.15. Williams argued that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his waiver of a jury trial, because-counsel failed to adequately advise Williams of the procedural mechanisms which would prevent African-Americans from being arbitrarily excluded from his jury. The circuit court denied Williams postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 436 S.W.3d 254, 2014 WL 3408259, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 771 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

436 S.W.3d 254 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.