Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

331 S.W.3d 741, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 2011 WL 601626

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2011·No. ED 95212, ED 95057·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Glenn Williams, Jr., appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Glenn Williams, Jr., appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for postcon-viction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Williams v. State, 331 S.W.3d 741, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 227, 2011 WL 601626 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

331 S.W.3d 741 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related