Reese v. McCORMACK BARON RAGAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reese v. McCORMACK BARON RAGAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

331 S.W.3d 741, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 225, 2011 WL 601647

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 2011·No. ED 95325·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Katisha Reese (“Claimant”), formerly known as Katisha Simmons, appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Katisha Reese (“Claimant”), formerly known as Katisha Simmons, appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Reese v. McCORMACK BARON RAGAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., 331 S.W.3d 741, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 225, 2011 WL 601647 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

331 S.W.3d 741 (Reese v. McCORMACK BARON RAGAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related