Williams v. State

386 S.W.3d 890, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1494, 2012 WL 5922650
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 119
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2012·No. No. ED 98048·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Semuel Williams, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 386 S.W.3d 890, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1494, 2012 WL 5922650 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

386 S.W.3d 890 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.