Williams v. State

365 S.W.3d 623, 2012 WL 1416881, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 119
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 2012·No. ED 97411·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Calvin Williams (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 365 S.W.3d 623, 2012 WL 1416881, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 554 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

365 S.W.3d 623 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jamison
365 S.W.3d 623 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)