Williams v. State
280 S.W.3d 789, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 460, 2009 WL 983292
Opinion
ORDER
Antwon Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 280 S.W.3d 789, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 460, 2009 WL 983292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
280 S.W.3d 789 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
280 S.W.3d 789 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)