Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

370 S.W.3d 889, 2012 WL 1339967, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 519

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2012

DocketNo. ED 97351

StatusPublished

This text of 370 S.W.3d 889 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 370 S.W.3d 889, 2012 WL 1339967, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 519 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron A. Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Williams’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An Extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron A. Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Williams’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An Extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

370 S.W.3d 889, 2012 WL 1339967, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-moctapp-2012.