Williams v. State
378 S.W.3d 423, 2012 WL 4355516, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1190
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 119 →
Opinion
ORDER
John Williams appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Williams claims that the motion court erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because his trial counsel failed to act as a reasonably competent attorney by failing to object to Detective Jason Miles’s hearsay testimony, and that without the hearsay testimony, the result of his trial would have been different. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 378 S.W.3d 423, 2012 WL 4355516, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1190 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
378 S.W.3d 423 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.