Williams v. State

497 S.W.3d 778, 2016 WL 2731549, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 479
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1503
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 10, 2016·No. WD 78346·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Williams appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his convictions and sentences for two counts of class B felony child molestation in the first degree. He argues that the motion court clearly erred in finding that the State did not commit a Brady v. Maryland violation regarding audio and forensic DVD recordings and in rejecting his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 497 S.W.3d 778, 2016 WL 2731549, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 479 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

497 S.W.3d 778 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.