Williams v. State
416 S.W.3d 346, 2013 WL 6667044, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 227 →
Opinion
ORDER
Andre Williams, Sr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-[347]*347ry hearing. The motion court did not clearly err in denying Williams’ request for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 416 S.W.3d 346, 2013 WL 6667044, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
416 S.W.3d 346 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.