Williams v. State
464 S.W.3d 278, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 650, 2015 WL 3759502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1503 →
Opinion
ORDER
Scott Williams, Jr. appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief after an eviden-tiary hearing. .We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. State, 464 S.W.3d 278, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 650, 2015 WL 3759502 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).
464 S.W.3d 278 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.