Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

481 S.W.3d 922, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2016 WL 719449

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2016

DocketWD 77919

StatusPublished

This text of 481 S.W.3d 922 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. State, 481 S.W.3d 922, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2016 WL 719449 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[923]*923Order

Per Curiam.

Cameron Williams appeals-the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following a guilty plea to one charge of first-degree robbery. Williams contends that his plea was rendered unknowing and involuntary by the plea court’s failure to comply with Rule 24.02. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[923]*923Order

Per Curiam.

Cameron Williams appeals-the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following a guilty plea to one charge of first-degree robbery. Williams contends that his plea was rendered unknowing and involuntary by the plea court’s failure to comply with Rule 24.02. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 S.W.3d 922, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2016 WL 719449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-moctapp-2016.