Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. State

481 S.W.3d 922, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2016 WL 719449

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2016·No. WD 77919·Published

Opinion

[923] Order

Per Curiam.

Cameron Williams appeals-the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following a guilty plea to one charge of first-degree robbery. Williams contends that his plea was rendered unknowing and involuntary by the plea court’s failure to comply with Rule 24.02. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[923] Order

Per Curiam.

Cameron Williams appeals-the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following a guilty plea to one charge of first-degree robbery. Williams contends that his plea was rendered unknowing and involuntary by the plea court’s failure to comply with Rule 24.02. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Williams v. State, 481 S.W.3d 922, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 162, 2016 WL 719449 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

481 S.W.3d 922 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.