Williams v. State

509 S.W.3d 155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 54, 2017 WL 401918
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 2017·No. WD 79162·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

Bene’t Williams appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to six offenses. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigating evidence at sentencing concerning the circumstances surrounding some of the prior convictions listed in his sentencing assessment report. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. State, 509 S.W.3d 155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 54, 2017 WL 401918 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

509 S.W.3d 155 (Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.