Washington v. State

655 So. 2d 239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6118, 1995 WL 334382
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 1995·No. No. 94-1709·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Wilson v. State, 645 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), rev. granted, 654 So.2d 920 (Fla.1995); Washington v. State, 631 So.2d 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1986); White v. State, 446 So.2d 1031 (Fla.1984); Mobley v. State, 407 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). As in Wilson and Washington v. State, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D782, — So.2d - [1995 WL 134179] (Fla. 4th DCA March 29, 1995), [240]*240we certify conflict with Bell v. State, 624 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), rev. denied, 634 So.2d 622 (Fla.1994).

STONE, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 655 So. 2d 239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6118, 1995 WL 334382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 239 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. State
673 So. 2d 8 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)