Washington v. State
631 So. 2d 367, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 779, 1994 WL 34005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1994·No. No. 93-1020·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse those portions of appellant’s sentencing orders adjudicating him to be an habitual offender. See Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993) (in addition to receiving prior written notice of the state’s intent to habitualize, defendant must be made personally aware of both the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington v. State, 631 So. 2d 367, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 779, 1994 WL 34005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
631 So. 2d 367 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington v. State
655 So. 2d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Wilson v. State
645 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)