Washington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Washington v. State

631 So. 2d 367, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 779, 1994 WL 34005

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 9, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1020

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 631 So. 2d 367 (Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. State, 631 So. 2d 367, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 779, 1994 WL 34005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse those portions of appellant’s sentencing orders adjudicating him to be an habitual offender. See Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993) (in addition to receiving prior written notice of the state’s intent to habitualize, defendant must be made personally aware of both the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization).

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse those portions of appellant’s sentencing orders adjudicating him to be an habitual offender. See Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993) (in addition to receiving prior written notice of the state’s intent to habitualize, defendant must be made personally aware of both the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization).

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

631 So. 2d 367, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 779, 1994 WL 34005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack