Schneider v. State

825 So. 2d 476, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12071, 2002 WL 1940164
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 2002·No. No. 2D02-784·Published

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

John Thomas Schneider appeals the order of the trial court refusing to resentence him on case number 90-998 in accordance with the mandate of this court issued in Schneider v. State, 788 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (hereinafter “Schneider I”). The trial court concluded that resentencing was unnecessary because Schneider had already been resen-tenced in that case prior to the issuance of our mandate. Schneider argues and we agree that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to resentence Schneider prior to the issuance of our mandate. See Washington v. State, 637 So.2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We therefore reverse the trial court’s order and remand the case for Schneider to be resentenced on counts I and III of case number 90-998 in accordance with the mandate issued in Schneider I.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing. _

BLUE, C.J., and KELLY, J„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schneider v. State, 825 So. 2d 476, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 12071, 2002 WL 1940164 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

825 So. 2d 476 (Schneider v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. State
637 So. 2d 296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Schneider v. State
788 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)