Bell v. State

610 So. 2d 737, 1993 WL 5319
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 13, 1993
Docket91-03001
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 610 So. 2d 737 (Bell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bell v. State, 610 So. 2d 737, 1993 WL 5319 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

610 So.2d 737 (1993)

Jacob F. BELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-03001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 13, 1993.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

*738 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

THREADGILL, Judge.

We affirm the appellant's sentences as a habitual felony offender following revocation of his probation pursuant to King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. den., 602 So.2d 942 (Fla. 1992), but remand for recalculation of jail credits.

In circuit court case number 90-10492, the appellant is to be given credit for time served and earned gain time accrued during his prior imprisonment on this case in accordance with State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla. 1989).[1] The trial judge gave him credit only for the days actually served. He is also to be given credit for jail time served while awaiting his probation violation hearing, but only if he did not receive such credit in the companion circuit court case number 90-2777. See Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla. 1986) (defendant sentenced to consecutive imprisonment not entitled to credit in each sentence for time spent in jail awaiting disposition).

Affirmed; remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

NOTES

[1] Section 948.06(6), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), has been enacted to counter State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla. 1989). The appellant's offense was, however, committed before the effective date of the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linton v. State
702 So. 2d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Simms v. State
627 So. 2d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Moultrie v. State
618 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hayes v. State
610 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 737, 1993 WL 5319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.