Washington v. State

673 So. 2d 8, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 51, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 33, 1996 WL 47694
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Washington v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 653 So. 2d 362
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 1, 1996·No. No. 86082·Published

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Washington v. State, 655 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), wherein the court certified conflict with Bell v. State, 624 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 622 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We find the two cases distinguishable. We approve Washington.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. HARDING, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 673 So. 2d 8, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 51, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 33, 1996 WL 47694 (Fla. 1996).

673 So. 2d 8 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
624 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Washington v. State
655 So. 2d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)