Washington v. State
632 So. 2d 283, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1349, 1994 WL 54810
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 1994·No. No. 93-297·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm Washington’s convictions and sentences except that we reverse his conviction and sentence for the offense of battery on a law enforcement officer because the trial court failed to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of simple battery. Accordingly, we remand this case for a new trial on this charge. See State v. Wimberly, 498 So.2d 929 (Fla.1986); Crapps v. State, 566 So.2d 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Washington v. State, 632 So. 2d 283, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1349, 1994 WL 54810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
632 So. 2d 283 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington v. State
649 So. 2d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)