Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance

Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance

64 S.E. 456, 132 Ga. 515, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 346
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 19, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 456 (Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance, 64 S.E. 456, 132 Ga. 515, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 346 (Ga. 1909).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. This being the first grant of a new trial, and the verdict not having been demanded absolutely by the evidence, this court, without undertaking to make any adjudication with respect to the reason assigned by the trial judge as the basis of his action, will affirm the judgment. Civil Code, §5585; Cox v. Grady, ante, 368 (64 S. E. 262); McCain v. College Park, 112 Ga. 701 (37 S. E. 971); Brantley Co. v. Bank of Waycross, Id. 532 (37 S. E. 737); Harvey y. Bowles, Id. 363 (37 S. E. 363); Weinkle v. Brunswick R. Co., 107 Ga. 367 (33 S. E. 471); Macon Street R. Co. v. Jones, 116 Ga. 351 (42 S. E. 468); Allen v. Lumpkin, Id. 777 (43 S. E. 54).

2. This rule applies although the judge who presided at the trial may have ceased to hold office before the hearing of the motion for new trial, and it was passed on by his successor.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berman v. Berman
200 S.E.2d 870 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Denney v. Tate
99 S.E.2d 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Wallace v. Speed
91 S.E.2d 53 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Seabolt v. Lewis
63 S.E.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Davis v. Davis
11 S.E.2d 884 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Belk v. Cook
179 S.E. 870 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Murray v. Davidson
162 S.E. 526 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Lee v. Loveland
157 S.E. 707 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Sunbeam Heating Co. v. Mason
155 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Carr v. Carr
121 S.E. 227 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Jones v. Moore
213 P. 191 (Utah Supreme Court, 1923)
Maynard v. American Railway Express Co.
115 S.E. 35 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Fairburn & Atlanta Railway & Electric Co. v. Latham
107 S.E. 88 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Covin v. Cairo Banking Co.
101 S.E. 304 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Cowart v. Strickland
100 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Ballenger v. Ballenger
94 S.E. 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Callahan v. Athens Railway & Electric Co.
87 S.E. 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
New v. Southern Railway Co.
71 S.E. 1104 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 S.E. 456, 132 Ga. 515, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/van-giesen-v-queen-insurance-ga-1909.