Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham

43 S.E. 54, 116 Ga. 777, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 257
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 43 S.E. 54 (Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham, 43 S.E. 54, 116 Ga. 777, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 257 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Little, J.

This case falls within the thoroughly established rule that a judgment granting a first new trial will not be disturbed unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict was, under the law applicable, demanded by the evidence ; which was not so in the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Carr v. Carr
121 S.E. 227 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance
64 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 S.E. 54, 116 Ga. 777, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-lumpkin-dunham-ga-1902.