Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham

43 S.E. 54, 116 Ga. 777, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 257
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 12, 1902·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Little, J.

This case falls within the thoroughly established rule that a judgment granting a first new trial will not be disturbed unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict was, under the law applicable, demanded by the evidence ; which was not so in the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham, 43 S.E. 54, 116 Ga. 777, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 257 (Ga. 1902).

43 S.E. 54 (Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Carr v. Carr
121 S.E. 227 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance
64 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)