Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham
43 S.E. 54, 116 Ga. 777, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 257
Opinion
This case falls within the thoroughly established rule that a judgment granting a first new trial will not be disturbed unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict was, under the law applicable, demanded by the evidence ; which was not so in the present case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham, 43 S.E. 54, 116 Ga. 777, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 257 (Ga. 1902).
43 S.E. 54 (Allen v. Lumpkin & Dunham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Carr v. Carr
121 S.E. 227 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance
64 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)