Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
37 S.E. 363, 112 Ga. 253, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 120
Opinion
The first grant of a new trial, whether general or based upon special grounds, will not be disturbed by- this court unless the verdict was demanded by the evidence. Civil Code, § 5585; Carolee v. Handelis, 103 Ga. 299, 302; Weinkle v. Railroad Co., 107 Ga. 367.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 37 S.E. 363, 112 Ga. 253, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 120 (Ga. 1900).
37 S.E. 363 (Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holden v. CTC Finance Corp.
145 S.E.2d 597 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Hopkins v. Brumbelow
24 S.E.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County
110 S.E. 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County
110 S.E. 303 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Adamson v. Adamson
91 S.E. 684 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance
64 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Macon Consolidated Street Railroad v. Jones
42 S.E. 468 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Harvey v. Bowles
37 S.E. 363 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)