Adamson v. Adamson

91 S.E. 684, 146 Ga. 546, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 382
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 24, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

1. This case falls within the rule that the first grant of a new trial, whether based upon general or special grounds, will not be disturbed by this court unless the verdict was required by the evidence. Watson v. Equitable Mortgage Co., 112 Ga. 253 (37 S. E. 363).

2. The superior court is a court of record, and a motion to set aside a judgment must be in writing. The court did not err in refusing, on an oral motion, to vacate the judgment granting a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adamson v. Adamson, 91 S.E. 684, 146 Ga. 546, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 382 (Ga. 1917).

91 S.E. 684 (Adamson v. Adamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Motor Contract Co. v. Wigington
157 S.E.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)