Ballenger v. Ballenger

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ballenger v. Ballenger

94 S.E. 237, 147 Ga. 351, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 185

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 15, 1917·No. No. 176·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

George, J.

This being the first grant of a new trial, and the verdict not having been demanded absolutely by the evidence, this court, without undertaking to make any adjudication with respect to the reason assigned by the trial judge as the basis of his action, will affirm the judgment. Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance Co., 132 Ga. 515 (64 S. E. 456).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George, J.

This being the first grant of a new trial, and the verdict not having been demanded absolutely by the evidence, this court, without undertaking to make any adjudication with respect to the reason assigned by the trial judge as the basis of his action, will affirm the judgment. Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance Co., 132 Ga. 515 (64 S. E. 456).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Ballenger v. Ballenger, 94 S.E. 237, 147 Ga. 351, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 185 (Ga. 1917).

Pincite

94 S.E. 237 (Ballenger v. Ballenger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related