Callahan v. Athens Railway & Electric Co.
87 S.E. 763, 17 Ga. App. 490, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 724
Opinion
Unless the verdict returned was demanded by the law and the evidence, this court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial, regardless of the ground specified by the trial judge as the reason for such grant. See New v. Southern Railway Co., 136 Ga. 778 (71 S. E. 1104); Stricklin v. Brotherton, 136 Ga. 456 (71 S. E. 774); Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance Co., 132 Ga. 515 (64 S. E. 456).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Callahan v. Athens Railway & Electric Co., 87 S.E. 763, 17 Ga. App. 490, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 724 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).
87 S.E. 763 (Callahan v. Athens Railway & Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance
64 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Stricklin v. Brotherton
71 S.E. 774 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
New v. Southern Railway Co.
71 S.E. 1104 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)