McCain v. College Park

37 S.E. 971, 112 Ga. 701, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 64
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 28, 1901·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

This being the first grant of a new trial, and the verdict not having been demanded by the evidence, this court, without undertaking to make any adjudication with respect to the special reason assigned by the trial judge as the basis of his action, will affirm the judgment. Sea Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 363, and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Action for damages. Before Judge Eeid. City court of Atlanta. July 3, 1900. Goodwin & Hallman and George Westmoreland, for plaintiff. Culberson & Willingham and Horsey, Brewster & Howell, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCain v. College Park, 37 S.E. 971, 112 Ga. 701, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 64 (Ga. 1901).

37 S.E. 971 (McCain v. College Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopkins v. Brumbelow
24 S.E.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Brooks v. Jackins
142 S.E. 574 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Carr v. Carr
121 S.E. 227 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County
110 S.E. 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County
110 S.E. 303 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance
64 S.E. 456 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)