United States v. Hopkins

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2006
Docket05-7385
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Hopkins (United States v. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Hopkins, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7385

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SEAN JERVITT HOPKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-224)

Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 2, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Jervitt Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. James Marton Trusty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Sean Jervitt Hopkins appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions for production of certain evidence associated

with his criminal trial. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Hopkins, No. CR-99-224

(D. Md. Aug. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Hopkins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hopkins-ca4-2006.