United States v. Hopkins

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Hopkins

223 F. App'x 218

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Hopkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 197 F. App'x 235 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2007·No. No. 06-7798·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sean Jervitt Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sean Jervitt Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Hopkins, 223 F. App'x 218 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 218 (United States v. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.